Agriculture

The full audit pack prints from the system instead of taking a week to assemble

Treatment records, fertilisation log, batch cards, HACCP records and certificates in one place. Every record is created as the work happens, and the system tracks expiry dates before the auditor asks.

Does this sound like your week before an audit?

The week before an audit, nobody does anything else

The quality manager collects records from farms, certificate scans and protocols from binders. Production waits for answers, and someone still finds a gap the day before the visit.

A certificate expired, and the retailer told you

A water test, a scale calibration certificate or a sprayer operator's training ran out. The retail chain noticed before you did and put the order on hold.

The same treatment in three registers

The treatment is in the agronomist's notebook, in the Integrated Production logbook and in the GlobalG.A.P. form. Three entries, three chances for dates and doses to diverge.

Seven parts that make up the system

The scope depends on the standards you hold: one setup for a producer group with GlobalG.A.P., another for a plant with IFS and BRCGS.

Registers required by law

Plant protection treatment records, fertilisation log, nitrogen fertilisation plan, supplier and buyer register. The entry is made once, and the register assembles itself in the form the inspection expects.

Standard checklists

GlobalG.A.P., IFS Food, BRCGS, QS and Integrated Production checkpoints mapped to documents and records in the system. You see which points have evidence and which do not yet.

Batch card and HACCP records

Records from critical control points: temperatures, metal detector, line cleaning, raw material intake. The batch card collects them from production, not from copied forms.

Expiry dates and reminders

Certificates, water and soil tests, scale calibrations, sprayer inspections, training. The reminder goes out with the lead time you set, to the person who has to act on it.

Document archive with versions

Procedures, instructions, protocols and scans with date, author and version. The auditor gets the version in force on the day of the event, not the latest one.

Non-conformities and corrective actions

A finding from an internal audit or from a retailer has an owner, a deadline and proof of closure. Open non-conformities are visible on one screen.

Audit pack in one click

You pick the standard and the period, the system assembles the set: registers, certificates, batch cards, protocols. PDFs to send, or read-only access for the auditor.

What AI does in compliance records

Three years ago features like these needed a data science team. Today language models read emails, documents and photos, and we build them into the system we make for you. Below is what makes sense in this solution. A person approves, AI prepares.

Certificates read and filed under their expiry date

A scan of a certificate, a lab test result or a calibration certificate becomes a record with expiry date, number and scope. The quality manager confirms with one click.

Example a PDF of a pesticide residue test → an entry on the batch with the list of substances and a "within limits" status

A gap in the records before the audit

The system compares the records with the standard's checklist and points out missing evidence: a treatment with no weather conditions, a batch with no result, an employee with no training.

Example a review of GlobalG.A.P. checkpoints for the quarter → four gaps with the name of the missing document and the person who creates it

Ask the registers

The auditor asks, the quality manager answers from the system, not from memory or a binder.

Example "which products did you use on carrots in July and what was the pre-harvest interval?" → a list of treatments with dates and days to harvest

A draft corrective action

From the description of the non-conformity and similar past cases, AI prepares a draft corrective action. The quality manager edits and approves.

Example finding "missing signature on the line 2 cleaning protocol" → a draft with root cause, correction and deadline, ready for approval

Effects you see in the first month

  • The audit pack assembles from the system in an hour, because every record was created as the work happened
  • You know about an expiring certificate before the retail chain does, because the reminder goes out in advance
  • A treatment logged once lands in the treatment record, the Integrated Production logbook and the GlobalG.A.P. checklist
  • A non-conformity has an owner and a deadline, so it does not come back at the next audit
What it connects to

Records are created where the work is

The compliance system has no separate forms to fill in. It takes records from the field log, raw material intake, data loggers on the line and the ERP.

GlobalG.A.P.IFS FoodBRCGSQSIntegrated ProductionHACCPplant protection treatment records (PIORiN)temperature loggersmetal detectorsexternal labs (LIMS)Comarch ERPenova365Microsoft 365 / SharePointKSeF

From the checklist to the first audit run from the system

We start with the standard whose audit is closest. The first pack is assembled for an internal audit, so the external one is a repeat.

01

Map of requirements and documents

We take the checklist of your standards and go point by point: where the evidence is today, who creates it and in what form.
2–3 weeks
02

Registers and archive

Treatment records, fertilisation log, certificate archive with expiry dates for one farm or plant. The first audit pack for an internal audit comes from the system.
6–8 weeks
03

HACCP, non-conformities and checklists

Critical control point records from production, non-conformity handling, mapping to standard checkpoints. More plants and standards once the first is verified.
4–6 weeks
04

Archive migration

Scans from binders and files from drives go into the archive with dates and versions. The previous year is in the system before the next audit.
2 weeks

Does your company run on Excel, emails and a system from years ago? We will build the solution that puts it in order, with AI inside from the start.

You have the diagnosis, we build the solution. Web applications, B2B portals and automations for companies without a large IT department. Today a system can read emails and documents, suggest decisions and answer customers on its own, so we build that in from the first version, not as an add-on a year later.

We agree scope, price and dates upfront, show progress every week, and the code and data stay yours.

  • scope, price and dates upfront
  • progress every week
  • your code and data

Common questions

Will the auditor accept electronic records?
GlobalG.A.P., IFS and BRCGS accept electronic records if they are complete, dated and protected from backdated changes. The system stores the author and time of every entry, and the auditor gets read-only access.
What about paper registers from previous years?
We scan them and enter them into the archive with dates. Treatments from recent seasons can go into the records if you need rotation history in the system.
Does this replace our quality representative?
No. The representative stops collecting paper and starts making sure records are created on time. The system prepares, a person approves and answers to the auditor.
Who owns the code and the data?
You do. The code goes into your repository, the data sits in your database on servers in Poland or the EU. You can change vendors at any point.
What does maintenance cost after the rollout?
Hosting and monitoring are a fixed monthly amount that depends on scale, with no per-user fees. Checklist changes after a standard is updated are billed by the queue.

Let's talk about your next audit

You tell us which standards you hold and what the last week before an audit looked like, we tell you what can be assembled from the system and how long it takes.

Write to us
or email hello@udb.pl hello@udb.pl